American expected defeat in Ukraine: a golden opportunity for freedom movements! By Hafeez Hassanabadi

 American expected defeat in Ukraine: a golden opportunity for freedom movements!

 

 By Hafeez Hassanabadi

 

If the Russian special operation in Ukraine is called the soft start of the third world war, it will not be out of place because at this time, Europe and NATO countries are fighting a direct war with Russia through Ukraine under the leadership of the United States. The goals of both are clear that the United States and its allies want Russia to be disintegrated.

 While Russia wishes that wherever there is global or regional decision-making, Russia's opinion should be given importance in terms of its weight. And any decision should not conflict with Russian national interests. And this is only possible if America and its allies accept Russia as an equal partner. And instead of adopting a hostile attitude towards it, provide it with an environment for lively competition, which is also known as "live and let live" policy.

 Instead of acting with patience and wisdom to fulfill its desire, the United States fueled such an adventure based on wrong estimates, wrong data and superficial analysis, which first of all caused immense harm to the United States itself and its allies. Created problems. And ease was created for all those forces to whom America never wanted to give relief.

 The loss of Afghanistan, the creation of a favorable environment for the growth of China's influence in the region, the helplessness of the United States in bringing the rise of people's power in Iran to a positive result, the defeat of the state of Ukraine. Creation of successful opportunities for national movements. These are all things that America and its allies never wanted to see, but some things have happened and some are yet to happen.

 America's series of bad decisions began when it hurriedly started the Doha talks, giving the impression that the US wanted out of Afghanistan at all costs, instead of starting negotiations with the Taliban on a solid basis.

On which we have expressed our concern in dozens of our articles and what is happening in Afghanistan and the region today was pointed out in those articles.

Many American and European intellectuals and political commentators also warned in advance of the disastrous effects of America's withdrawal from Afghanistan.

But America, in its obsession to conquer Russia through Ukraine, did not consider anyone's opinion to be considered.

This is a different matter from time to time, the US Congress admits that the hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan was a serious mistake. Due to which the entire region including Afghanistan got out of hand and the influence of American supremacy in the world was irreparably damaged.

The tragedy at this time is that America is invisibly present in Afghanistan and visibly absent, but it does not dare to admit it, because after its withdrawal, women's work in Afghanistan is stopped and the education of girls above the sixth grade in schools. The ban, obstructions in the work of the media, disruptions in the work of human rights organizations, etc., about which the UN officials often complain, are topics that the United States is not ready to take responsibility for, even though the duration of the Doha negotiations is the protection of all of them. The guarantee was given by him.

 Today, he does not have the answer that on what basis he took the responsibility of establishing an inclusive government and solving other problems? Nor is the answer to why he gives forty to fifty million dollars every week uninterruptedly when he is angry with the work of a government or does not recognize it at all? Most importantly, he can't even tell his and his allies' taxpayers and the Afghan people exactly what deal they've walked out on or run away from. The current government in Kabul says we have defeated the US and the US says they left under an agreement.

 Here the question arises that if the United States has been defeated then the terms of the agreement are not correct and if the agreement has been reached then the claim of defeat is not based on reality. If the agreement has been reached, why is it not being implemented? If America has been defeated, how can the victor ask for help from the vanquished?

 America's penchant for untimely indentured servitude with Russia has given China, its true and real rival, an opportunity to play openly in the region, and China has wasted no time in re-establishing its historic friendship with Russia. Provided a strong foundation and restored diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran in the region, creating an environment for them to encourage development, prosperity and tolerance towards each other. In friendship with America, the United States made us afraid of Iran by calling it a hooligan and made us hostile, and because of its fear, we continued to buy billions of dollars’ worth of arms from the U.S. annually. Fearing this, the United States established its military bases in our countries. We used to bear the cost of billions of dollars, but now China has made peace with this "enemy.". Taking us both out of the frenzy of war allows us to spend our money on the betterment of our people instead of stockpiling arms and rearing proxies.

Along with the restoration of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the positive signs of ceasefire in Yemen are very encouraging and progress. A war that has so far killed four lakh people and left around forty-five lakh people homeless Its move toward the end is a testament to regional powers' confidence in China, which could have far-reaching consequences in the future.

Even if America tries hard, it cannot stop China from increasing its political influence in the region, nor can it create an obstacle in front of its economic achievements. Because the Chinese currency Yuan has been able to push the US dollar in a very short period to such an extent that in recent days forty-one countries, including Russia, France, Venezuela, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Brazil etc., have signed trade agreements with China in Yuan. It is as if America paved the way to weaken itself politically and economically in this region with its own hands.

Another fear that has long been debated by observers regarding Chinese ambitions, is that China lends to poor countries on very harsh terms under a specific scheme that they cannot repay due to their overall corrupt political, economic and administrative system. As a result, they will be forced to surrender their freedom and sovereignty to China, which they call the worst form of modern colonialism. To prevent it, the United States and its allies do not have a comprehensive and feasible plan, nor do they have any such force after the end of the war due to the economic and political losses due to the full participation of NATO countries in the Russia-Ukraine war. will remain so that they can stand in front of any plan of China.

 Europe and the United States have pushed themselves to such an alienation that they urgently need to revise their attitudes and policies to get out of which the Foreign Minister of India, Mr.Jaishankar said.

"Europe has made its mind that the world's problems are the world's own problems. They should solve their problems, but Europe's problems are everyone's problems". Until today, the leader of any developing country has never spoken so bluntly and harshly about Europe, but now they are doing it, which means that Europe should not demand any one-sided attention.

 Because in the rest of the world this concern is now conscious that when problems surround us, you are indifferent, but when you are in trouble, you expect the world to come running and sympathize, or that "We (India) are told that buying oil from Russia means helping Russia in the war, but Europe is silent on buying gas from Russia. We give money by buying oil and Europe gives money by buying gas. "If our money goes to help Russia in the war, where does the money given by Europe go?" Such a response from India should be said to be the beginning of a turning point in the collective relations of the world for America and Europe, which neither America nor Europe would have been waiting for.

 The United States not only put Europe in trouble, but also greatly increased the problems of its close friends, Japan and South Korea. By unwittingly joining the arms race, they have justified China and North Korea to be more aggressive than before.

 America and Europe have been longing to see a democratic government in Iran for a long time. And this desire of theirs was close to success when in 2022 the people there came out on the streets with a great awareness for their basic national, religious and civil rights. But they could not get the internal and external period from America and Europe in time that fulfilled the requirements of a successful revolution. As a result, hundreds of people lost their lives, and thousands were put in prisons, but the government of Tehran has not deteriorated and emerged in a stronger position.

 Now, with the help of China and Russia, its relations with the Arabs have started to become pleasant, which can later have a positive effect on Iran-Israel relations, and the United States is pushing hard to stop the New World Order. A shift in favor of Russia and China is accelerating, leading to a certain defeat of the United States.

 Golden opportunity for freedom movements:

 As the scope of the US and its allies' failures continues to widen It is quite possible that in the coming days, the national liberation movements will get a boost in the whole world and especially in the countries under the influence of America and NATO countries. It is not far-fetched that even in many NATO countries such movements, which were not able to rise despite existing there for a long time, will now rise thanks to the new world conflict.

 After the Second World War, from 1947 to 1960, nearly three dozen countries gained independence from their colonial rulers. Their conscious struggle and enormous sacrifices behind achieving their independence also had one common cause, that is, they’re the colonial rulers were so economically and militarily weakened after World War II that they could no longer put their colonies to the sword. This was the reason why the colonial rulers left some countries without any major war or resistance after seeing the views of the people, while in some countries they were expelled as a result of bloody wars and revolutions.

 If the war between Russia and the Western powers in Ukraine lasts two to four years, the global and regional alignments that we can only imagine now. They will appear in practice

 Just as the United States is trying to uproot the roots of Russia and China, Russia and China, together with their friends, will try to cut those roots spread far away from the United States and Europe. With the help of which the United States and its allies pave the way for themselves to intervene in the internal affairs of different countries of the world by using various pretexts to make them fight each other, steal their resources and continue to rule over them forever.

In this context, Russia and China will definitely want such nations to gain their independence from the United States and its allies, which the United States always uses as a weapon for its interests. But in this regard, unity will be the first condition for any freedom movement.

 So that he can guarantee the stability of the newly formed state because no world power takes the risk of going from one war to another. And at the same time, the essence of this alliance should also be seen that it can defend its interests while keeping in mind the interests of the newly formed ally and give a clear roadmap for mutual cooperation. So that they can be effective in preventing America from inventing new proxies.

The author is a Baloch journalist who graduated from Leningrad State University USSR. His writings cover a wide range of issues in Balochistan and Central Asia. He has been a senior analyst and columnist for the popular Balochistan-based Daily Tawar Newspaper. He is also the author of the book ‘The Bin Laden’s Secret: How he lived in a Pakistani haven and how it is related to the Baloch national question?’