The problem of Ukraine: Russia's problem is not Ukraine, but de-Americanization. By Hafeez Hasanabadi


 


The problem of Ukraine: Russia's problem is not Ukraine, but de-Americanization. 


By Hafeez Hassanabadi 


Apparently, this is the main reason for the Russian special operation in Ukraine. That Russia does not allow Ukraine to become a proxy for NATO can create permanent problems for Russia.

The Basis of Russophobia, such chauvinist and fascist generations grew up in the neighbourhood, which will threaten the existence of Russia tomorrow.


But with time, it is becoming clear that if the United States of America (U.S.A) wants to destroy Russia through Ukraine and exclude it from all international affairs, Russia will be the US's target. Realizing their ambitions, Russia intends not only de-Nazification but the demilitarization of Ukraine. Russia wanted to stop the hand of the United States, which made Georgia and then Ukraine an enemy of Russia. Therefore Russia is trying to De-Americanization and introduce a new system of global balance by providing the world with a multipolar environment.


As for the statements of the United States of America and its allies, they reject the possibility that Ukraine could have created a problem for Russia, so the launch of a particular operation by Russia is a hypothetical misstep. The statements of former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, former French president Francois Holland and former President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, confirmed the ambitions of the United States of America (U.S.A) and its allies, where the three mentioned leaders said revealed that the 2014/15 Minsk Agreements brokered by France, Germany and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) between Russia and Ukraine were intended to buy time for Ukraine to come to terms with Russia's to defeat Russia by preparing for war.


This means that what Russia believed to be an opportunity for peace efforts and diplomacy by the United States of America (U.S.A) and the West was a deception against Russia. The West did everything possible to prepare Ukraine for war with massive funding so that it could defeat Russia in a short period, like in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. He had defeated five Arab countries, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, and Iraq, while Kuwait and Lebanon had partial help in a few days. Still, he could not make Israel out of Ukraine, nor could Russia, according to his estimate, be weak.


Despite the immense help and support from the West, why could Ukraine not become as powerful and organized as Israel? This question has been answered in this short but inappropriate sentence by Andrew Milburn, an American ex-Marine officer believed to be the founder of the "Mozart Group" in Ukraine. He trained Ukrainians to fight against Russia. "Ukraine is a f****d-up corrupt society, “ This one sentence shows what the Americans think about their ally.


However, they still did not give up on fighting Ukraine against Russia because, firstly, they had invested heavily in this project. Secondly, no other neighbouring country was willing to make the mistake of clashing with Russia. Or say that no one was willing to cut his neck to get a gold necklace for his neck.


It may be incorrect to say that the United States of America (U.S.A) and its allies were satisfied with Ukraine's preparations. If they were confident with Ukraine's preparations against Russia, they would never have hastily handed over Afghanistan to the Taliban on Pakistan's false guarantee. We will discuss in a separate article about putting Afghanistan into hell and the failed United States of America withdrawal.


This was the purpose of being relatively free from the Afghan issue so that if Russia attacked Ukraine at any stage, they would all stand together in front of Russia. Given this idea, to improve its position, the US and West opened the first front in Central Asia, keeping Russia and its allied states, especially Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, busy there, and drew full attention to open the second front in Ukraine. But this plan failed in such a way that they did not have the opportunity to open a show for Central Asia in Afghanistan. Because the thousands of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) fighters collected in the last days of Ashraf Ghani's regime in the north of Afghanistan were brought to Central Asia and managed. Before the arrangement was complete, Russia took an unexpected initiative and started a war in Ukraine. One thing should be mentioned here that on the one hand, the Russian Ministry of Defense and intelligence agencies did not allow the West and Ukraine to make further preparations against Russia; on the other hand, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs adopted an unprecedented strategy in this region, including Afghanistan. Either make them allies or persuade them to remain neutral, for which the United States of America and its partners were not mentally prepared.


The truth behind Ukraine's success stories:


Since the early days of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, some things have been frequently reported in the Western media. Some of these rumours spread very quickly and disappeared into the air; for example, Russian President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is seriously ill, and he will step down from power at any time. Will it be done, or are people rising against president V. V. Putin in Russia over the war in Ukraine; Russian society is divided from within, which puts the Kremlin under intense pressure to bring about the end of Russian President V. V. Putin's power at any time. It may be that the Russian economy will collapse and Russia will disintegrate from within due to economic problems like the Soviet Union or that the Ukrainian army is making significant progress and is too weak to fight them in the field. They are not getting enough success.


But now, the time has put everything in its proper place. The conclusion is that Russian president V. V. Putin is entirely healthy, there is no disagreement in the Russian leadership on the above issue, and Russian society is more united than ever. Already, the Russian economy is in a much better position than the European Unions country's economy, where inflation is between 4.7% and 5%, compared to 10% to 20% in Europe.


Ukraine has received 100 billion dollars in war aid from the United States alone. Still, the result of its successes and advances is that Russia has taken over 27% of its land, and 50% of its population has left the country. Ukrainian has taken refuge in Russia, Europe, the U.K., the U.S., Canada and different countries. Its energy sector is 90% destroyed, and Russia almost destroyed its air force in the early days of the war.


Internationally, geographically 80% of the world is either with Russia, against economic sanctions or not in favour of ending relations with Russia. And in terms of population, six billion people are with Russia, Or they do not support US policies against Russia. It appears the world does not support United States policies against Russia. Moreover, despite all the efforts of the United States, the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) could not persuade the BRICS countries to take any action against Russia or the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Russia has been suspended or expelled from the SCO and Group of Twenty G20; similarly, no decision has been taken against Russia in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).


Now, despite this, if it is said in the West that Ukraine is winning this war and Russia is losing due to isolation in the world, then they can say so because they used to say the same thing in Afghanistan, but now it is printed here. The question arises that in Afghanistan, where they could not defeat the Taliban on broken motorcycles with their soldiers and all modern war equipment, how will they defeat the regular army of a superpower like Russia in Ukraine? Like Afghanistan, they don't even have soldiers, they only have weapons that they couldn't deliver on time, and they won't be able to provide all the weapons to Ukraine in the amount they are demanding in the coming days, because they don't fulfill the promises they are making. They cannot because providing Ukraine with weapons means keeping nothing for its defence, and they cannot do that. The bigger question is, assuming that NATO gives Ukraine everything it is asking for and still fails to defeat Russia, what will NATO and Ukraine do next?


This question will come up sooner or later, and this will be the stage from which they will sit at the table to solve the problem. If the United States of America and its allies win, then, of course, no one will talk to Russia, and they will divide Russia like a hot cake, but if they fail to do so and Russia wins, will Russia sit with them? If sitting, on what conditions?

At this time, in the case of Russia, the United States of America (U.S.A) is under more pressure and isolation to a great extent at any time; neither Latin America is with the U.S, nor is India ready to listen, nor are Arabs countries obeying orders like before, and it has not been possible to intimidate China.


Allies mainly European countries who seem to be with the United States of America against Russia and in favour of sanctions on Russia, but their leaders are not able to satisfy their people with their actions; from France to Germany, the ordinary people call this war a disaster as they see that Europe is suffering the most in this war. The burden of refugees, inflation, unemployment, closure of factories or disruptions in their work, and energy crisis is all part of Europe. Due to the boycott of Russian oil, gas and fertilizer, European countries have given eight hundred billion dollars in subsidies to their consumers. But despite this, the people could not be saved from the worst economic problems. According to Bloomberg, Germany will allocate one trillion dollars to deal with the energy issue in the future; this is the situation of most other European countries.

Due to the creation of an atmosphere of war, all European countries are throwing billions of dollars in the race to collect weapons, which is affecting the social life of their people and causing strong adverse and depressing effects on their quality of life. The supreme commander United States of America is free from all these problems. Still, this war is a source of income for him, who is earning billions of dollars by taking advantage of the energy crisis in Europe by selling his gas to them at high prices.


Conclusion: This war was started in Ukraine by inciting Russia, but now it is not going to end by ridding Ukraine of neo-Nazism and weapons

because now, it has become apparent to the Russians that they are not fighting this war against the Neo-Nazi regime of Ukraine but against NATO and United States. And Russia is also considering NATO as a modern form of the Wehrmacht. Just as Hitler hated the Soviet Union, the NATO countries inherited the same hatred. They formed this military alliance in 1949, The founders were the same people who spread Nazism in Germany and occupied many countries of Europe and played a key role in the attack on the Soviet Union. Among them, Lieutenant General Adolf Heusinger, who was Hitler's right-hand man and Chief of Army Staff of Wehrmacht, was the Chairman of NATO from 1961 to 1964. He played a vital role in the second world war , which killed around fifty million people. 

If Hitler's Nazi combined army (Wehrmacht) could not do the work. Now this work will be done by many European countries together on the platform of NATO. Now when the matter is like this, then Russia's strategy will also be the same. Which was done by the Soviet Union to defeat Hitler's combined military power in the Second World War, that is, the elimination of the enemy from its root. 


Remember that when the Soviet Red Army expelled Hitler from the Soviet Union, the suggestion was brought before the Soviet leadership that we had liberated our country. Now we should let Europe and Germany have their own business. But the Soviet leadership, led by Stalin, decided to root out Nazism and the fall of Berlin. 

 This time, Russia will not allow America to attack Russia again under any other pretext, but it will end this war only after new international agreements.



America's global monopoly will end, and the world will move forward according to the new balance between the two powers. In other words, Russia will end the war with de-Americanization. For Russia, de-Americanization does not mean the end of America, but the end of its arbitrariness and he has to submit to international laws in such a way that he "desires" the world to observe them.

It is clear from the words of the Russian leadership that they will never allow the United States of America to consider itself above all international laws. If not, he will create such a problem for Russia and perhaps the world next time, from which it may be impossible to get rid of it, so this is a clear message from Russia to the United States of America (U.S.A) that "Enough is Enough."


The author is a Baloch journalist who graduated from Leningrad State University USSR. His writings cover a wide range of issues in Balochistan and Central Asia. He has been a senior analyst and columnist for the popular Balochistan-based Daily Tawar Newspaper. He is also the author of the book ‘The Bin Laden’s Secret: How he lived in a Pakistani haven and how it is related to the Baloch national question?’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

American expected defeat in Ukraine: a golden opportunity for freedom movements! By Hafeez Hassanabadi

Hafeez Hassanabadi, Translated Articles